Skip to content
Log in

Resource Allocation Review

Reads where the people actually are as the real strategy, and compares it against the stated one.

0

Share this prompt

Free — no card needed

Create a free account

to open Resource Allocation Review — and the other 364 prompts across 21 categories.

We store your email address to send these. We never sell it or pass it to advertisers. Withdraw at any time. Privacy Policy.

Already have an account?

CategoryStrategyForFounders, Operators, ConsultantsTested onClaudeChatGPT

Running it, start to finish

  1. Compare stated priorities against where time and money actually go.
  2. Quantify the maintenance load before planning anything new.
  3. Fund the fragmented initiatives properly or stop them.

What you get back

The output this produces, every time.

  • States the gap between stated and revealed priorities numerically, which makes it undeniable.
  • Finds initiatives resourced enough to continue and not to succeed, the worst possible position.
  • Counts leadership attention, which is scarcer than headcount and tracked nowhere.

Getting better results

Where this usually goes wrong, and how to avoid it.

  • Measure the maintenance load. It is usually far larger than believed and is the actual constraint on doing anything new.
  • Fund or stop the fragmented ones. Starving an initiative is easier than stopping it and produces the cost without the outcome.
  • Consider narrowing the strategy. If the priorities cannot be resourced with what exists, the problem is the strategy rather than the teams.

More Strategy prompts

All Strategy

Written for The AI University. Every prompt in this library is original work — authored, tested and revised here, not collected from elsewhere. 365 of them, free with an account.