Skip to content
Log in

Source Credibility Assessment

Assesses funding, method, date and whether it is primary — in that order, since the first two explain most disagreements.

0

Share this prompt

Free — no card needed

Create a free account

to open Source Credibility Assessment — and the other 364 prompts across 21 categories.

We store your email address to send these. We never sell it or pass it to advertisers. Withdraw at any time. Privacy Policy.

Already have an account?

CategoryResearchForAnalysts, Writers, ConsultantsTested onClaudeChatGPTGemini

Running it, start to finish

  1. Trace the claim back to primary work.
  2. Identify the funder and what their interest would predict.
  3. Compare the finding against how it is summarised.

What you get back

The output this produces, every time.

  • Traces whether the source is primary, since a citation chain is one piece of evidence appearing as several.
  • States the funder's interest and checks whether the findings run in that direction.
  • Separates what the study supports from what its summary claims.

Getting better results

Where this usually goes wrong, and how to avoid it.

  • Look hardest at sample selection. It is where most weak studies fail, and a self-selected or convenience sample undermines everything downstream.
  • Check correlation is not reported as cause. It is the most common misrepresentation in research reporting, and it usually happens in the summary rather than the paper.
  • Ask why sources disagree. The reason — different populations, definitions or interests — is usually more informative than the disagreement.

More Research prompts

All Research

Written for The AI University. Every prompt in this library is original work — authored, tested and revised here, not collected from elsewhere. 365 of them, free with an account.