Skip to content
Log in

The poor man's covered call, explained

The same shape as a covered call, built for a fraction of the capital. Instead of a hundred shares, the long leg is a deep in-the-money call dated a year or more out — and the short call is sold against that.

Construction
Long deep ITM long-dated call + short near-dated call
Outlook
Mildly rising
Premium
Paid on one leg, collected on another
Complexity
3 of 3

Share this guide

What it is

Formally this is a diagonal call spread: two calls, different strikes, different expiries. The long one is deep in the money and far out in time, so it moves nearly one-for-one with the shares and behaves as a substitute for them. The short one is near the money and near-dated, sold to collect premium exactly as in a covered call.

The appeal is capital. A hundred shares of a $100 underlying costs $10,000; a deep long-dated call on the same underlying might cost a quarter of that. The same premium-collecting structure becomes available on a much smaller account.

The substitution is not free, and the differences are where this position bites. The long call has an expiry, so time works against it continuously. It pays no dividends. It carries its own bid-ask spread on entry and exit. And if the underlying falls hard, the long call can lose a far greater percentage of its value than the shares would — leverage runs in both directions.

How it works

  1. Buy a long-dated call, deep in the money

    Typically a year or more to expiry and struck well below the current price, so that most of what you pay is intrinsic value and very little is time value. The deeper it is, the more closely it tracks the shares and the less there is to decay.

  2. Check what you paid for time

    The extrinsic portion — price paid less intrinsic value — is the amount that will decay to nothing if held to expiry. On this structure it is the single most important number and it is easy to skip past.

  3. Sell a near-dated call above the current price

    The same decision as a covered call's short leg. The strike must sit above the long call's strike, or the structure's arithmetic inverts.

  4. Roll the short leg as it expires

    Each expiry that passes below the short strike is premium kept. Sell another against the same long call. The long leg is held throughout and is the thing the whole position rests on.

The payoff

Why there is no diagram here

There is no honest single-expiry diagram for this structure, and drawing one anyway is the most common error in published options material. A diagonal holds two different expiries: on the day the short call expires, the long call still has a year of time value that no expiry curve models. A diagram showing both legs expiring together would describe a vertical spread — a different position with a materially smaller worst case — and would understate what this one can lose. What is true and can be stated: the loss is capped at the net paid, the gain is capped once the underlying passes the short strike, and where those caps sit depends on what the long call is worth on the day, which is a modelling question rather than an arithmetic one.

Want to draw a different combination of strikes and premiums? The options payoff calculator takes any set of legs you enter and plots them. It runs in your browser and nothing you type is transmitted.

Worked example

XYZ is a placeholder, not a real security. Every guide in this section uses it at $100 so the structures can be compared directly.

XYZ trades at $100. A call struck at $70, expiring in fourteen months, costs $34.00 — $3,400 for the contract. Of that, $30 is intrinsic and $4.00 is time value.

Against it you sell a thirty-day $105 call for $2.50, collecting $250. Net outlay so far: $3,150, against the $10,000 a hundred shares would have cost.

If XYZ sits below $105 at the short expiry, the short call expires worthless, you keep the $250, and you sell another against the same long call.

If XYZ finishes above $105, the short call is in the money. You either close it and roll, or let the position be exercised and exercise the long call against it, capturing the $35 difference in strikes less what you paid net.

If XYZ falls to $70, the long call is at the money with time value only — a loss of most of the $3,400. The same fall on a hundred shares would be a $3,000 loss on a $10,000 position. Proportionally this structure has done considerably worse.

Both sides of it

What it gives you

  • A fraction of the capital a hundred shares would require
  • The same premium-collecting shape as a covered call
  • Losses on the long leg are capped at what was paid for it
  • One long leg can support many successive short legs

What it costs you

  • The long call decays and expires — shares do neither
  • No dividends, and a dividend can trigger early assignment on the short leg
  • Leverage amplifies a decline as readily as a rise
  • Two spreads to cross on entry, and more on every roll
  • If the short strike sits below the long strike plus net cost, the best case is a loss

What assignment does

Early assignment on the short leg leaves you short a hundred shares against a long call, which brokers generally permit but which is not the position you intended. The usual response is to exercise the long call to deliver, closing everything at once — but that discards whatever time value the long call still held, which can be substantial. Dividends are the common trigger, so an ex-dividend date falling inside the short leg's life is worth knowing about in advance.

Frequently asked questions

Why is it called a poor man's covered call?
Because it produces the covered call's payoff shape without the capital to buy a hundred shares. The name is informal and slightly misleading — it is a diagonal call spread, and the differences from a genuine covered call are not cosmetic. It decays, it expires, it pays no dividend, and it magnifies declines.
How deep should the long call be?
The mechanical trade-off is fixed: deeper strikes cost more in absolute terms, track the shares more closely, and carry less time value to lose. Shallower strikes cost less and behave less like stock. A common rule of thumb is to choose a strike deep enough that time value is a small fraction of the total paid, since that fraction is the part certain to disappear.
What is the biggest risk in this structure?
That the underlying falls and stays down. The long call then loses value both from the move and from time passing, and the short calls you can sell against it collect almost nothing. Unlike a real covered call, where you are left holding shares that might recover over years, here the long leg has a deadline.
Can the short strike be below the long strike?
It can be entered, and it is usually a mistake. If the short strike sits below the long strike the structure can be exercised against you at a price that guarantees a loss on the spread regardless of what the underlying does. The short strike should sit above the long strike by at least the net amount paid for the position.

Related guides

These guides explain how each structure is built and how it behaves. Nothing here is a suggestion to buy or sell anything, no security is named, no figure is quoted from any market, and no structure is presented as better than another — which one suits a situation is not a question this page can answer.

⚠ Important disclaimer

These calculators are provided strictly for educational and informational purposes. They perform arithmetic on figures you enter. Nothing on these pages is financial, investment, trading, legal or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, derivative, commodity or cryptocurrency.

The creator is not a registered investment adviser, research analyst or broker with the SEC, FINRA, CFTC, NFA, any U.S. state securities regulator, or SEBI (as an Investment Adviser or Research Analyst). Trading involves substantial risk of loss — you can lose some or all of your capital, and with leveraged instruments you can lose more than you deposit.

Contract specifications, lot sizes and margin rates shown here are seeded from published standards, are editable, and may be out of date or wrong for your broker. Exchanges revise lot sizes and margin requirements, and brokers routinely impose more than the regulatory minimum. Verify every figure against your own broker before acting on it. These tools carry no warranty of any kind and may contain errors.

You are solely responsible for your own decisions. Read the full legal disclaimer →